Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.centre-univ-mila.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/470
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorسهيلة, شبوكي, بلمهبول كريمة-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-24T10:56:40Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-24T10:56:40Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.citationمذكرة مكملة استكمالا لمتطلبات نيل شهادة الماستر تخصص: اقتصاد نقدي و بنكيen_US
dc.identifier.other300-1154-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.centre-univ-mila.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/470-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study is to Evaluate the performance of ABC bank and JPM bank, using the CAMELS standard through the following six criteria: capital adequacy, asset quality, management, profitability and liquidity, market risk sensitivity, In order to know the classification of each bank according to this standard and find differences between them. We concluded that the two banks under study had a good performance and that there were differences in performance between them according to Camels criteria, These differences are likely to favor to US banken_US
dc.language.isoaren_US
dc.publisherAbdelhafid Boussouf University centre- Milaen_US
dc.subjectperformance Evaluation, CAMELS standard, capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, profitability, liquidity, market risk sensitivity, ratingen_US
dc.titlecamelsتقييم أداء البنوك التجارية باستخدام معيارen_US
dc.title.alternativeخلال الفترة 2014-2017JPM والبنك الأمريكي جبي مورغان ABC مقارنة بين البنك الزراعي الصينيen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Business and management economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
330115411.pdf5,34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.