طرق الطعن في الاحكام الجزا ئية

آدم , مهاجري , بلقط ضياء الدين

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.centre-univ-mila.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/4180

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	آدم , مهاجري , بلقط ضياء الدين	-
dc.date.accessioned	2025-07-13T11:18:55Z	-
dc.date.available	2025-07-13T11:18:55Z	-
dc.date.issued	2025-06	-
dc.identifier.citation	قانون جنائي	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://dspace.centre-univ-mila.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/4180	-
dc.description	This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the means of appeal in criminal judgments, focusing on ordinary appeals such as opposition and appeal, as well as extraordinary remedies, particularly cassation before the Supreme Court and the petition for retrial. The research adopted an analytical legal methodology by examining relevant legal texts, especially the Algerian Code of Criminal Procedure, and comparing them with judicial precedents and scholarly opinions. For data collection, we relied on official legislative sources, rulings from the Supreme Court, legal doctrines, and specialized academic theses. The study concluded that the Algerian legal system provides important guarantees for criminal justice through the diversity of appeal ethods. However, it also suffers from certain shortcomings, such as procedural complexity and delays in the resolution of appeals. This highlights the need for reforms, particularly in simplifying procedures, accelerating legal processes, and unifying judicial interpretations to strengthen public trust in the judicial system and ensure legal security.	en_US
dc.language.iso	ar	en_US
dc.publisher	Abdelhafid boussouf university Centre mila	en_US
dc.title	طرق الطعن في الاحكام الجزا ئية	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Political and legal sciences

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
طرق الطعن في الاحكام الجزائية (2).pdf		1,14 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Show simple item record